Archive for October, 2009

From a Connecticut Yankee

Sunday, October 18th, 2009
It isn’t all that often that positive things happen in the legal system with respect to inmate issues. We are therefore so very pleased to learn of the revamping of New York’s ultra oppressive Rockefeller Drug Law. Nelson Rockefeller with his countless millions you may recall, decided that the best social program to help addicts, particularly those who did low level drug sales to support heir habits, was to throw them in jail. Of course Rathskeller’s only interface with those unfortunate folks who happen to be addicted, was when him Limo passed by New York’s Washington Square Park (Remember Needle Park, you New Yorkers?). In any event, one of the good things New York’s present Governor has done, is to crusade for changes in the Law. Happily was successful and over 650 New York State inmates are now applying for early release. In the same vein, the State of CT has modified its Law. Previously before an inmate could file an appeal it was necessary to obtain the approval of the prosecutor. How absurd is that? How many of you know prosecutors who after working to put someone in prison is going to do a quick 180, and agree to give the inmate an appeal? Give me a break! Well that’s changed. The prosecutor is happily out of the equation. Appeals will go to the Judge. I’m not sure that will make a difference in the outcome, but at least now there’s a shot. Go for it CT.

We’ve been getting lots of calls from disguntled mom’s (some from dad’s as well). They go something like this…”He’s my baby’s daddy, and he got all this money and I don’t even have Pampers. I want you to post his butt all over the place.”  Certainly lets hope that those of us who can afford it will help our “baby’s momma” (and daddy)  as much as we can, and is practical, but gee whiz it isn’t always easy from behind the wall. They put up with all kinds of “stuff” out there, but they have no clue about the mental, and even physical stresses we go though when incarcerated. We won’t do any posting, but if we can help you at all by telling your significant other what you go through on a daily basis, please feel free to have them call us collect. We’d be happy to talk to them, and we might even be able to help them in terms of finding resources.

Connecticut Yankee

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Hi Greetings from God’s Waiting Room…SUnny SUnrise FL where the local temp is 87….

Blog from I’m not a Connecticut Yankee

The addition e-mail and other computer based services to federal inmates is a wonderful step in the direction of bringing federal prisons into the 21st century. I’ve spoken to several inmates who use the e-mails to stay in touch with their loved ones. They can’t say enough good things about the system. The only real negative is the cost. At five cents a minute, it doesn’t ake very long before one is spending several dollars a day in e-mail communication. SUch a sum is at least difficult for many inmates to sustain. It would be a good thing if the BOP reevaluated the costs associated with inmates e-mail and perhaps dropped them a bit. Another neded addition to the system is the ability to include attachments. I do not know the logistics of the technical issues involved. I do however, know that the ability to receive photoraphs of loved ones would be a tremendous mood lifter for many inmates.

While we are on th esubject of costs, it would be negligent not to touch upon the high cost associated witht the purchase of commissary items AT BOP facilities. A six pack of Pepsi is sold for over three dollars in the commissary. On sales days at the local market one can purchase 5 twelve packs for ten dollars. Certainly the BOP’s buying power could result in lower costs to the inmate population. Soda is but one example of several. There are many more.

A long the same lines, inmate telephone call are really expensive and telephone time insufficient for many inmates. Twenty three cents a minute for self dialed prepaid calls is terribly expensive when compared against 5 cents a minue many of us pay to carriers on our home phone. The same applies to minutes. I don’t doubt 300 minutes a month is adequate for some inmates but for those with families, 300 minutes becomes woefully inadequate.

It would be a goos thing if the BOP took a long look at some of these costs, and adjusted them in favor of the inmate population.