Posts Tagged ‘dept of corrections’

From a Connecticut Yankee Read On….

Monday, November 16th, 2009

Although this may sound a bit like a commercial, it is not intended to do any more than solicit information from our readers. We urge you to read the contents of this blog, and provide us with feedback. That which we are planning will involve a considerable effort in both people power and financial resources. If the out come is favorable, it could be a ground breaking in terms of employment for those of us who have been incarcerated in the past, and/or those of us who are being released from a prison in the near future.

We propose to become employment contractors of sorts. We will solicit business from large corporations, construction companies, retailers and even mom and pop stores. We would propose to supply these entities with trained and skilled workers. Those workers would remain our employees and our responsibility. We will use the Federal Bonding program up to its $10,000 limit, and we will post our own blanket bond in the amount of $15,000. In that way, our employees will be bonded for up to $25,000. That places a serious dent in any objections an employer might have in using the services (as opposed to hiring) a felon.

For the inmate crafts persons, we would sponsor them in an on line store…not unlike a mini e-bay for inmates. We would pay the costs associated with the web site(s), and even perhaps loan the inmate money for tools of a trade to start his or her on line business.

For mechanics, computer and other repair/technical persons we could do something similar. Kind of a “felons are us,” without using the word felons, nor any overt references to it. We would have to disclose to potential employers…but so what?

Please let us know what you think. An e-mail to us:
will be very much appreciated.

We value your input. Please write to us and share your thoughts.

From a Connecticut Yankee

Sunday, October 18th, 2009
It isn’t all that often that positive things happen in the legal system with respect to inmate issues. We are therefore so very pleased to learn of the revamping of New York’s ultra oppressive Rockefeller Drug Law. Nelson Rockefeller with his countless millions you may recall, decided that the best social program to help addicts, particularly those who did low level drug sales to support heir habits, was to throw them in jail. Of course Rathskeller’s only interface with those unfortunate folks who happen to be addicted, was when him Limo passed by New York’s Washington Square Park (Remember Needle Park, you New Yorkers?). In any event, one of the good things New York’s present Governor has done, is to crusade for changes in the Law. Happily was successful and over 650 New York State inmates are now applying for early release. In the same vein, the State of CT has modified its Law. Previously before an inmate could file an appeal it was necessary to obtain the approval of the prosecutor. How absurd is that? How many of you know prosecutors who after working to put someone in prison is going to do a quick 180, and agree to give the inmate an appeal? Give me a break! Well that’s changed. The prosecutor is happily out of the equation. Appeals will go to the Judge. I’m not sure that will make a difference in the outcome, but at least now there’s a shot. Go for it CT.

We’ve been getting lots of calls from disguntled mom’s (some from dad’s as well). They go something like this…”He’s my baby’s daddy, and he got all this money and I don’t even have Pampers. I want you to post his butt all over the place.”  Certainly lets hope that those of us who can afford it will help our “baby’s momma” (and daddy)  as much as we can, and is practical, but gee whiz it isn’t always easy from behind the wall. They put up with all kinds of “stuff” out there, but they have no clue about the mental, and even physical stresses we go though when incarcerated. We won’t do any posting, but if we can help you at all by telling your significant other what you go through on a daily basis, please feel free to have them call us collect. We’d be happy to talk to them, and we might even be able to help them in terms of finding resources.

Connecticut Yankee

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Hi Greetings from God’s Waiting Room…SUnny SUnrise FL where the local temp is 87….

Blog from I’m not a Connecticut Yankee

The addition e-mail and other computer based services to federal inmates is a wonderful step in the direction of bringing federal prisons into the 21st century. I’ve spoken to several inmates who use the e-mails to stay in touch with their loved ones. They can’t say enough good things about the system. The only real negative is the cost. At five cents a minute, it doesn’t ake very long before one is spending several dollars a day in e-mail communication. SUch a sum is at least difficult for many inmates to sustain. It would be a good thing if the BOP reevaluated the costs associated with inmates e-mail and perhaps dropped them a bit. Another neded addition to the system is the ability to include attachments. I do not know the logistics of the technical issues involved. I do however, know that the ability to receive photoraphs of loved ones would be a tremendous mood lifter for many inmates.

While we are on th esubject of costs, it would be negligent not to touch upon the high cost associated witht the purchase of commissary items AT BOP facilities. A six pack of Pepsi is sold for over three dollars in the commissary. On sales days at the local market one can purchase 5 twelve packs for ten dollars. Certainly the BOP’s buying power could result in lower costs to the inmate population. Soda is but one example of several. There are many more.

A long the same lines, inmate telephone call are really expensive and telephone time insufficient for many inmates. Twenty three cents a minute for self dialed prepaid calls is terribly expensive when compared against 5 cents a minue many of us pay to carriers on our home phone. The same applies to minutes. I don’t doubt 300 minutes a month is adequate for some inmates but for those with families, 300 minutes becomes woefully inadequate.

It would be a goos thing if the BOP took a long look at some of these costs, and adjusted them in favor of the inmate population.

Written By: “I’m no Connecticut Yankee”

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

Every week we plan to select a topic or story of interest to our readers. We appreciate your comments and feed back. By reason of our readership on both sides of the wall, this blog will for the most part use screen names only. We are domiciled in the state of CT, and interesting happenings at one of their facilities suggested we write about them in our first attempt.

The best thing about the CT Department of Corrections is its new acting Commissioner, Brian Murphy. Commissioner Murphy has worked his way up the ranks from Correction Officer to Commissioner. Inmates respect his no nonsense but fair treatment and reasonable policies. Staff members we are told appreciate the fact he’s been in the trenches with them and proven himself more than able at every facet of the job. The only sad part about Murphy’s tenure is that it won’t last. He’s acting Commissioner, and only staying long enough for a new Commissioner to be selected. When he finally decides to call it a day Commissioner Murphy will be sorely missed.

Given Commissioner Murphy’s well known b.s. intolerance level, one can only wonder whether there is some connection between Murphy taking the reigns and the following story about a long over due personnel change.

The CT Department of Corrections, and CMHC finally did something right with respect to inmate health care at one of their large facilities. It was long, long over due, but late than never….Nursing Supervisor PW has been tossed out of the prison where she ran the Medical Department as her own private fiefdom for many years. The sign outside her door said it all, “Queen Bee.“ That sign was permitted to remain on the wall outside her office door by DOC Officials for years.

Countless numbers of inmates suffered at Ms. P’s hands, and her staff for the most part both feared and disliked her. The fact is, she smelled…both literally and figuratively. An occasional bath would not have hurt her. Ms P obviously has friends way up on high, or she would have been long gone. One need look no further than the following references to get the picture, but there certainly is more.

N Page 1 of CERTIFIED MAIL – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED NO. _ STATE … <http://www.dir.ct.gov/dph/hcquality/Physician/010-RN/010-E46930/19910827010042.pdf>

FIC1990-435.htm <http://www.state.ct.us/FOI/1991FD/19910814/FIC1990-435.htm>

Aug 14, 1991 … a. those indicating the dollar amount of overtime paid from January … of overtime

May of us wonder how Ms P survived this incident, and another. On that occasion it was alleged she acted improperly with respect to her personal overtime. A figure of almost $175,000.00 in earnings was mentioned for Ms. P. Quite a haul. That incident caught some minimal media attention, yet she wasn’t terminated. Rather, she was “hidden” in another facility and brought back when things cooled down. Ms. P is allegedly a master at inventing incidents to bolster her own worth and promote her favorite cause, “Ms. P‘s job security. She kept the medical department in a state of perpetual chaos, allegedly for her own nefarious purposes. In one instance, she allegedly invented a story about a 22 year veteran Nurse that lead to the Nurse’s forced retirement. In other instances, she allegedly altered records and facts to support her own position. As seen above, she was good at covering up, but not perfect. She got caught. At the end of the day however, any inmate who became embroiled in a tiff with Ms. P found himself in cuffs and leg irons and on the next bus to Hartford. For the most part she didn’t treat staff much different, except maybe for a few of her long time cronies.

The unfortunate part of the story is that they didn’t and can’t get rid of her. They can shift her around as they’ve done, but she wont leave the system she’s allegedly abused for years, and “they” are afraid to do anything about her.

The good news is that P’s replacement As Nursing Supervisor, Mr. S is a really excellent Nurse, a decent human being, and we’d guess a good leader. Mr. S will get the respect of inmates and staff alike because he’s earned it, and not because he demands it. Nurses from up high and on down (perhaps especially from on high) will be rooting for his success, and doing all they can to assist him in meeting his objectives for the Department. It is likely this great move by the Department of Corrections will result in a significantly increased quality, and quantity of inmate health care delivery, and at a decreased cost to the tax payers, by reason of the Ms. P chaos factor having been eliminated.

The facility about which we write is a large institution. The health care delivery situation at that facility has been kind of up down for years. Old time Nurses, ala JF protected their areas and bullied some of the newer and more competent people who they believed posed a threat to them. Apart from PW a major part of the of the problem was the quality of the on site administration. For some time there was an Hospital Administrator running the whole shooting match…a health care facility for then over 2,400 inmates and his claim to work history fame is that he is a Dental Technician. Go figure.